Lateral liner wanted: fitted, no crease and tight
Jun 04, 2007
Fitting accuracy, flat surface and leaktightness: the latest IKT-Product-Test "Liners for Laterals" shows which liners fulfil the requirements of the network operators. The marks range from "VERY GOOD" to "POOR". Even the best liner, however, is not always free of malfunction.
The rehabilitation of laterals is becoming increasingly important. With high proportions of extraneous water the cost-intensive rehabilitation only really makes sense if the private sewers are rehabilitated, too. However, laws as well as standards require tight laterals such as §45 NRW-Bauordnung (building regulations North Rhine Westphalia) and DIN 1986. The technical demands on the rehabilitation of laterals with cured-in-place pipes (CIPP) are tremendous. They have far smaller diameters (e. g. DN 150 and smaller) than public collector lines. They are often marked by tight bends up to 90 degrees. Furthermore, in many cases the accessibility is far more limited than in public space. In addition, numerous practical investigations by IKT show that their damage rate is clearly higher than the one of "large" sewers, namely more than 70%. For this reason the NRW Ministry of Environment and 14 sewer network operators wanted to learn more about the suitability of cured-in-place pipes for rehabilitating laterals. They all put the IKT - Institute for Underground Infrastructure in charge of the product test "Liners for laterals". The following network operators participated in the product test:
- Eigenbetrieb Abwasser
- Stadt Alsdorf
- Abwasserwerk Stadt Bergisch Gladbach
- Stadt Dinslaken
- Stadtentwässerungsbetrieb Düsseldorf
- Stadt Gladbeck
- Stadtentwässerung Göttingen
- Stadt Hilden
- Stadtentwässerungsbetriebe Köln AöR
- Stadt Neuss
- Niederrheinische Versorgung und Verkehr AG (NVV)
- Stadtwerke Quickborn
- Stadt Recklinghausen
- Entsorgungsbetriebe Warendorf
- Staatliches Hochbauamt Würzburg
Liner in the test
The IKT-testers assessed the following eight liners:
The IKT-testers assessed the following eight liners:
- BendiLiner, EasyLiner GmbH
- Brawoliner-Fix, KOB KG
- DrainLiner, epros GmbH
- DrainPlusliner, epros GmbH
- Flex-Liner, ALOCIT Chemie GmbH
- Konudur Homeliner, MC Bauchemie Müller GmbH & Co. KG
- ProFlex Liner (prototype), VFG AG
- SoftLiner, EasyLiner GmbH
Two other liner manufacturers declined to take part in the product test. For details see result tables.
Test set-up
For the product test the IKT-testers installed laterals with defined damages in the IKT large-scale test facility. Here, they differentiated between two applications:
For the product test the IKT-testers installed laterals with defined damages in the IKT large-scale test facility. Here, they differentiated between two applications:
- "Standard situation": vitrified clay sewer DN 150 with several bends and damages, rehabilitation via an inspection opening at the ground surface.
- "Extreme situation": vitrified clay sewer DN 150 with change of dimension and material transition to PVC sewer DN 125 as well as several bends and damages, rehabilitation via an inspection opening at a downpipe.
Overall result
The winner of the test is the "Brawoliner-Fix“ by KOB with an overall score of "GOOD" in the standard situation and "VERY GOOD" in the extreme situation.
The "Flex-Liner" by ALOCIT Chemie GmbH and the „ProFlex Liner“ by VFG AG, of which only a prototype entered the race, were at the bottom of the list. It could be observed that all test candidates improved the operability of damaged laterals even in extremely bent laterals. Numerous liners, however, presented disappointing results in the very important leaktightness test. Here, only three of the eight tested liners are "GOOD" and better.
Varying quality
All cured-in-place liners showed variations in the liner properties. The IKT-testers noticed these variations in the circumference of the liners, e.g. when measuring the wall thickness, as well as in the length of the liner, e.g. when determining the density. The results of the leaktightness tests according to the APS guideline underline the varying quality of the liners. The dispersion of the results even partially leads to apparent contradictions in the test results. So due to these variations the "Brawoliner-Fix" performs better in the extreme situation ("VERY GOOD") than in the standard situation ("GOOD").
All cured-in-place liners showed variations in the liner properties. The IKT-testers noticed these variations in the circumference of the liners, e.g. when measuring the wall thickness, as well as in the length of the liner, e.g. when determining the density. The results of the leaktightness tests according to the APS guideline underline the varying quality of the liners. The dispersion of the results even partially leads to apparent contradictions in the test results. So due to these variations the "Brawoliner-Fix" performs better in the extreme situation ("VERY GOOD") than in the standard situation ("GOOD").
The strains introduced during HP cleaning and mechanical cleaning (spiral machine with various fittings) do not noticeably affect the liner quality. The dispersion of the material properties obviously dominates the result of the leaktightness tests. As a consequence of the strains usually only the inner foil is roughened or damaged in some parts. The IKT-testers did not notice changes in the carrier material.
Nearly all tested liners achieved better results in the recovery of operability than in leaktightness. A rehabilitation can be considered successful if the liner does not show any or only few creases and edges. To achieve this the liner material needs to have adequate flexibility especially in bends. This flexibility, however, can oppose the leaktightness of the material.
In the test this became particularly clear when several liner suppliers used different liners for rehabilitating the standard and the extreme situation. So "DrainPlusliner" and "BendiLiner", which were exclusively used in the extreme situation, showed far less creases in bends than the ones used in the standard situation "DrainLiner" and "SoftLiner". But, less creases in these cases led to clear loss in the sealing effect and thus to a worse overall result.
Quality assurance in preparation
Merely the test winner is able to convince in quality assurance with the score "VERY GOOD". Most suppliers provided incomplete or even no documents at all. Partially the documents refer to other materials than used in the test. However, many providers stated that they were currently improving the quality assurance of their products. According to this, three providers applied for a license by the Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt) for their liners.
Merely the test winner is able to convince in quality assurance with the score "VERY GOOD". Most suppliers provided incomplete or even no documents at all. Partially the documents refer to other materials than used in the test. However, many providers stated that they were currently improving the quality assurance of their products. According to this, three providers applied for a license by the Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt) for their liners.
In addition to their laboratory experiments, the IKT-Product-Testers visited selected construction sites where they inspected the procedures of the rehabilitating personnel and assessed the rehabilitation results. The gained impressions confirm the results gathered at IKT. It was found out that with the procedures liners can be installed under practical conditions (little working space, time pressure). Still the IKT testers found variations in quality, in the length of the liner and its circumference by carrying out random leaktightness tests.
Conclusions
Liners are not only suitable for rehabilitating public sewers, but just as well for rehabilitating smaller laterals. Here, there are numerous constructional challenges, however, under equally high demands on fitting accuracy, flat surfaces and leaktightness. The test shows that there are indeed liners that meet these requirements – but until today still too less. This is why property owners should take a closer look by means of which liner they have their laterals rehabilitated. For liner suppliers with less good results shows the test primarily the potential for improvements. The results clarify which product characteristics still need improvement. Hopefully, the suppliers regard the results as helpful criticism and act in a corresponding way. After all the aim of the independent and neutral IKT-Product-Tests is to build up pressure on the market quickening technical innovations and thus contributing to better products and methods.
Liners are not only suitable for rehabilitating public sewers, but just as well for rehabilitating smaller laterals. Here, there are numerous constructional challenges, however, under equally high demands on fitting accuracy, flat surfaces and leaktightness. The test shows that there are indeed liners that meet these requirements – but until today still too less. This is why property owners should take a closer look by means of which liner they have their laterals rehabilitated. For liner suppliers with less good results shows the test primarily the potential for improvements. The results clarify which product characteristics still need improvement. Hopefully, the suppliers regard the results as helpful criticism and act in a corresponding way. After all the aim of the independent and neutral IKT-Product-Tests is to build up pressure on the market quickening technical innovations and thus contributing to better products and methods.
| Table 1: IKT-Product-Test "Tube Liners for Lateral Pipes":sStandard situation 1 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liner supplier | KOB KG | epros GmbH | MC Bauchemie Müller GmbH & Co. KG | EasyLiner GmbH | ALOCIT Chemie GmbH | VFG AG | epros GmbH | EasyLiner GmbH | Mr. PIPE GmbH | Insituform Rohrsanierungstechniken GmbH | |
| Tube liner | BRAWOLINER - FIX | DrainLiner | Konudur Homeliner | SoftLiner | Flex-Liner | ProFlex-Liner (Prototyp) | DrainPlusLiner | BendiLiner | Mr. PIPE-Liner | Insituform-Liner | |
| Basic material | Polyester high-strengthfabric with PU foil | Polyester needle felt with PVC foil | Polyester needle felt with PU foil | Polyester needle felt with PU foil | Knitted polyester fabricwith PVC foil | Meshed felt with PU foil | - | - | - | - | |
| Resin system | Brawo I | EPROPOX VIS A4/B4 | Konudur 160 PL-XL | EasyPox 3008 | ALOCIT A 480, B 48.48 or 48.948 | Biresin LS | - | - | - | - | |
| IKT test mark: standard situation | GOOD (1.6) | SATISFACTORY (2.6) | SATISFACTORY (2.8) | SATISFACTORY (3.3) | ADEQUATE (4.2) | ADEQUATE (4.4) | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | |
| System test (weighting 80%) | good (1.6) | good (2.3) | good (2.1) | adequate (3.7) | adequate (4.0) | Tube liner was not used Reason: supplier decided to use the DrainLiner for refurbishment of the standard situation | Tube liner was not used Reason: supplier decided to use the SoftLiner for refurbishment of the standard situation | Participation declined Supplier's reason: quality already verifiedto an adequate extent by other documents (including DIBt certification) Complete letter declining participation dated 27.01.2005 included in Annex I of the final report | Participation declined Supplier's reason: test conditions outside the specifications of the Insituform-Liner Complete letter declining participation dated 14.02.2005 in Annex II of the final report | ||
| Refurbishment result (60%) | Operability2 (40%) | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.1 | ||||
| Tightness3 (40%) | 1.8 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.3 | |||||
| Tightness after HP cleaning3 (20%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |||||
| Tightness after mechanical cleaning3 (20%) | 1.6 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 5.4 | |||||
| Quality assurance (weighting 20%) | very good (1.5) | adequate (4.0) | poor (5.5) | adequate (4.5) | inadequate (6.0) | inadequate (6.0) | |||||
| DIBt certification4 (50%) | yes | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
| Environment compatibility test certificate submitted for the resin4 (20%) | yes5 | yes | no | yes7 | no | no | |||||
| Procedure manual and training courses4 (10%) | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | |||||
| External monitoring4 (10%) | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | |||||
| Evidence of disposability4 (10%) | no | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
| Construction site investigation | practice-orientated installation | not carried out6 | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | |||||
| Additional information: available for | 70mm to 200mm | 100mm to 300mm | 100mm to 300mm | 70mm to 1200mm | 50mm to 300mm | DN 70 to DN 200 | |||||
| Recommended improvements | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; extend DIBt certification to include the used resin system | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | |||||
| 1 "Standard situation" refers to the geometry of the lateral pipe. 2 Assessment of the operability through visual inspection of the refurbished standard situation by the sewage network operators: 100 points = 1.0 to 0 points = 6.0; marks depicted by a linear function. 3 Assessment: 100% tightness tests passed according to APS guideline = 1.0 to 0% tightness tests passed according to APS guideline = 6.0; marks depicted by a linear function. 4 Assessment: present = yes, not present = no; certifications/certificates/verifications must be valid for the materials used in the test. 5 According to the DIBt certification, a PE protective tube is to be used between the liner impregnated with resin and the pipe being refurbished when using the refurbishment method in areas saturated with ground water. 6 The liner was not used by the participating sewage network operators at the point in time of the site tests; the liner supplier could not name a site either. The installation procedure corresponds basically to that used for the DrainPlusliner. 7 Test certificate of the Hygiene Institute of the Ruhr area dated 1 August 2002: "Given the clear smell and taste contamination of the test water, it is advisable as a precaution to refrain from using in direct drinking water catchment areas (protection zone I) and in protection zone II"..." In our opinion[there] are no objections to using the material "EasyPox" in areas with groundwater contact, as long as these are above the saturated zone and outside drinking water protection zone II". 8 Both B-components (hardeners) 48.48 resp. 48.94 were available and were used. Assessment key for the test results: very good = 1.0 – 1.5, good = 1.6 – 2.5, satisfactory = 2.6 – 3.5, adequate = 3.6 – 4.5, poor = 4.6 – 5.5, inadequate = 5.6 – 6.0. | |||||||||||
| Table 2: IKT-Product-Test "Tube Liners for Lateral Pipes": extreme situation 1 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liner supplier | KOB KG | MC Bauchemie Müller GmbH & Co. KG | epros GmbH | EasyLiner GmbH | VFG AG | ALOCIT Chemie GmbH | epros GmbH | EasyLiner GmbH | Mr. PIPE GmbH | Insituform Rohrsanierungstechniken GmbH | |
| Tube liner | BRAWOLINER - FIX | Konudur Homeliner | DrainPlusLiner | BendiLiner | ProFlex-Liner (Prototyp) | Flex-Liner | DrainLiner | SoftLiner | Mr. PIPE-Liner | Insituform-Liner | |
| Basic material | Polyester high-strength fabric with PU foil | Polyester needle felt with PU foil | Polyester needle felt with PU foil | Polyester needle felt with PU foil | Meshed felt with PU foil | Knitted polyester fabricwith PVC foil | - | - | - | - | |
| Resin system | Brawo I | Konudur 160 PL-XL | EPROPOX VIS A4/B4 | EasyPox 3008 | Biresin LS | ALOCIT A 480, B 48.48 or 48.945 | - | - | - | - | |
| IKT test mark: extreme situation | VERY GOOD (1.3) | SATISFACTORY (3.2) | ADEQUATE (3.9) | ADEQUATE (4.1) | POOR (4.6) | POOR (5.1) | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | NOT ASSESSED | |
| System test (weighting 80%) | very good (1.2) | satisfactory (2.6) | adequate (3.9) | adequate (4.0) | adequate (4.3) | poor (4.9) | Tube liner was not used Reason: supplier decided to use the DrainPlusliner for refurbishment of the extreme situation | Tube liner was not used Reason: supplier decided to use the BendiLiner for refurbishment of the extreme situation | Participation declined Supplier's reason: quality already verified to an adequate extent by other documents (including DIBt certification Complete letter declining participation dated 27.01.2005 included in Annex I of the final report | Participation declined Supplier's reason: test conditions outside the specifications of the Insituform-Liner Complete letter declining participation dated 14.02.2005 in Annex II of the final report | |
| Refurbishment result (60%) | Operability2 (40%) | 1.9 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.5 | ||||
| Tightness3 (40%) | 1.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | |||||
| Tightness after HP cleaning3 (20%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.3 | |||||
| Tightness after mechanical cleaning3 (20%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.2 | |||||
| Quality assurance (weighting 20%) | very good (1.5) | poor (5.5) | adequate (4.0) | adequate (4.5) | inadequate (6.0) | inadequate (6.0) | |||||
| DIBt certification4 (50%) | yes | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
| Environment compatibility test certificate submitted for the resin4 (20%) | yes6 | no | yes | yes7 | no | no | |||||
| Procedure manual and training courses4 (10%) | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | |||||
| External monitoring4 (10%) | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | |||||
| Evidence of disposability4 (10%) | no | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
| Construction site investigation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | practice-orientated installation | |||||
| Additional information: available for | 70mm to 200mm | 100mm to 300mm | 100mm to 300mm | 100mm to 150mm | 70mm to 200mm | 50mm to 300mm | |||||
| Recommended improvements | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness; extend DIBt certification to include the used resinsystem | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | Reduce fluctuations in the liner properties; improve tightness and quality assurance | |||||
| 1 "Extreme situation" refers to the geometry of the lateral pipe. 2 Assessment of the operability through visual inspection of the refurbished standard situation by the sewage network operators: 100 points = 1.0 to 0 points = 6.0; marks depicted by a linear function. 3 Assessment: 100% tightness tests passed according to APS guideline = 1.0 to 0% tightness tests passed according to APS guideline = 6.0; marks depicted by a linear function. 4 Assessment: present = yes, not present = no; certifications/certificates/verifications must be valid for the materials used in the test. 5 Both B-components (hardeners) 48.48 resp. 48.94 were available and were used. 6 According to the DIBt certification, a PE protective tube is to be used between the liner impregnated with resin and the pipe being refurbished when using the refurbishment method in areas saturated with ground water. 7 Test certificate of the Hygiene Institute of the Ruhr area dated 1 August 2002: "Given the clear smell and taste contamination of the test water, it is advisable as a precaution to refrain from using in direct drinking water catchment areas (protection zone I) and in protection zone II"..." In our opinion [there] are no objections to using the material "EasyPox" in areas with groundwater contact, as long as these are above the saturated zone and outside drinking water protection zone II". Assessment key for the test results: very good = 1.0 – 1.5, good = 1.6 – 2.5, satisfactory = 2.6 – 3.5, adequate = 3.6 – 4.5, poor = 4.6 – 5.5, inadequate = 5.6 – 6.0. | |||||||||||
More News and Articles
Mar 24, 2023
News
Innovative technologies remove pharmaceutical residues from wastewater
Every year on 22 March, World Water Day reminds us of the importance of one of the most important resources of life. Almost two-thirds of our planet is covered with water, but not even three percent is drinkable freshwater. Every …
Mar 22, 2023
Article
Delivering sustainable solutions to solve water challenges
With British Water’s conference on creating a more sustainable water sector approaching, Stephen Kennedy, head of digital and innovation at MWH Treatment shares his views on celebrating recent successes in creating a more sustainable sector while also discussing the challenge …
Mar 20, 2023
News
Supporting the National Water Strategy through scientific research
This month, the federal government of Germany introduced the first National Water Strategy. “With this strategy, the federal government is shining a spotlight on the necessity of integrated water resource management, serving as a leading example of resource use in …
Mar 17, 2023
News
Trenchless manufacturer celebrates installation of 100,000th liner
SAERTEX multiCom®’s trenchless pipe relining product, SAERTEX-LINER, has been installed for the 100,000th time.
Mar 13, 2023
News
Spring collaborates with Microsoft and Impact X on water innovation
The water sector’s innovation centre of excellence – Spring - is collaborating with Microsoft and Impact X on a new initiative to make tools and funding available for start-ups to accelerate their companies.
Mar 10, 2023
Article
State of Global Water Resources report informs on rivers, land water storage and glaciers
WMO reports on freshwater availability in a changing climate
Mar 08, 2023
News
Australia: Centenarian sewer gets after-dark upgrade
Over 100 years since its inception, Brisbane’s S1 Main Sewer has undergone a seven-year upgrade.
Mar 06, 2023
News
UKWIR gives access to hundreds of water sector research reports
UK Water Industry Research (UKWIR) is providing free access to over 1,000 of its water sector research reports aimed at helping to improve water and wastewater services for customers, and protecting the environment.
Mar 03, 2023
News
Sector must challenge public misconceptions through engagement
The water sector must tackle “unfair criticisms” by sharing more about the great work it delivers, Yorkshire Water’s chief executive, Nicola Shaw, told attendees at British Water’s Better Together reception in Hull.
Mar 01, 2023
News
World-first project to ‘self heal’ cracked concrete using sludge could save $1.4 billion repair bill to Australia’s sewer pipes
Water treatment sludge could be used to prevent 117,000 kilometres of sewer pipes in Australia from cracking in future, without any intervention by humans, helping to save $1.4 billion in annual maintenance costs.
Feb 27, 2023
News
Delaware Water Treatment Plant Opts for Penetron to Protect New Concrete Structures
The final 2022 commissioning of the Doe Run Road Water Treatment Plant enables the city of Newark, Delaware (USA), to increase the quantity and quality of the city's drinking water to better meet growing demand – and EPA guidelines. PENETRON …
Feb 24, 2023
News
Aussie Trenchless: the future of pipe rehabilitation solutions
Aussie Trenchless has been passionate about progressing future infrastructure opportunities and accomplishing superior outcomes since it was founded in 2014.
Contact
Dipl.-Ing. Gunter Kaltenhäuser (IKT – Institute for Underground Infrastructure)
45886 Gelsenkirchen
Phone:
+49 209 17806 47
Fax:
+49 209 17806 88
