Decision making in rehabilitation strategy forecasts
Apr 19, 2012
Operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of sewer networks are mainly driven by the results of CCTV inspections which build the basis for meeting numerous rehabilitation decisions each planning year. These decisions additionally take into account empirical knowledge based on experiences made in the past and the corresponding ancillary conditions whether they are internal (coming from the network operators themselves) or external (coming from the operator’s political, social or ecological environment). A sustainable rehabilitation planning requires mandatory pro-active rehabilitation planning that identifies deficits before they actually occur. This activates enormous efficiency potentials as the early realization of an upcoming rehabilitation candidate widens the applicable rehabilitation possibilities.
The first step is the utilization of an ageing model that represents the individual deterioration behaviour of the analyzed network. That way the upcoming changes due to the continuous wear of the network can be predicted with a model like the semi-Markovchains.
To turn the prediction of the ongoing deterioration from a pure forecasting tool into an instrument for strategic and sustainable planning, the different decisions and the linked rehabilitation actions need to be a part of the forecasting procedure. That way it is not only possible to forecast the future ageing of the network but also how the ageing behaviour would change if certain rehabilitation decisions were applied, modified, postponed or renounced. The forecast of multiple possible but different rehabilitation strategies offers the chance of virtually rehabilitating the network, monitoring the effects, analyzing the results and selecting the most appropriate rehabilitation strategy according to the network operator’s predefined demands or iteratively forming an optimized strategy. This ex-ante check of the future rehabilitation strategy could lead to more sustainable rehabilitation planning but it definitely gives long-ranging planning security.
The crucial point of the strategy forecasts is the transparent, comprehensive and correct inclusion of the individual decision criteria in the analytical model of the ageing forecast.
Modeling of the Decision Process
A strategy prognosis generally consists of two main parts: the ageing forecast itself and the processing of the rehabilitation decision criteria with the related virtual rehabilitation of the selected candidates. This two-step-cycle repeats for each year of the strategy forecast. That way the consequences of the rehabilitation decision influence the ageing forecast of the subsequent year of the strategy forecast. Within the STATUS solution presented here the processing of the rehabilitation decision criteria is subdivided into three sub-processes
- preliminary decision space
- priority ranking
- final rehabilitation decision
which are closely related to the engineering approaches in the daily rehabilitation planning routine.
A suitable mathematical model for dividing the deterioration process of sewers into inferior condition grades is the semi-Markov process. Within this process different states or classes are distinguished which the pipes are assigned to. For each discrete point in time a pipe remains in exactly one of the defined classes. Between the classes transition probabilities are given. Within STATUS, a Weibull distribution is assumed for the transition functions. These are calibrated by applying the least square method to empirical inspection results of sewer pipes, considering their weighted length in a particular substance value or condition grade. The functions describe the probability of a pipe of a particular condition grade and construction year entering the next worse condition grade.
The forecast of the priority as well as the forecast of the wear reserve bases on the calibrated transition functions and time discrete Markovchains. Within the mathematical model of Markovchains, deterioration is modelled as a stochastic process in the long term by forecasting future developments. Transition, as well as residual, probabilities are assigned to each condition state. Thus, future development is a function of the present state only and not of the pipe’s history.
The deterioration process is considered to be unidirectional, i.e. the deterioration process is without intervention (renovation or replacement), which would indicate the end of the pipe’s service life or failure of the old pipe in the statistical sense. This means the forecasted values can only decrease (if no rehabilitation measure is applied), and the useful service life comes to its end when a pipe reaches the worst class in both priority and wear reserve. The figure above illustrates the semi-Markov-process. As not only the final state is forecasted but the individual values for priority and wear reserve are also determined by the process at each point in time (yearly intervals), it is possible to interact with the decision model at any point with individual rehabilitation measures. This gives the chance of beside replacement measures also having renovation and repair measures in the arsenal of possible interactions; each with its individual impact on the ageing behaviour of the particular object. This way, the analytical rehabilitation approach comes much closer to the daily rehabilitation procedure in the real world.
Preliminary decision space
The very first decision within daily rehabilitation planning is the alteration or calibration of the classification values coming from a formalized assessment system according to the individual viewpoint of the network operator. The formalized assessment systems like the one defined in DWA-guidelines and standards can not consider all possible ancillary conditions which may be important for the particular network operator. There is therefore a difference between the viewpoint of the standards and the viewpoint of the network operator which needs to be determined.
Within STATUS the task is settled by the use of decision cubes which form a general decision space for priority and wear reserve. Each axis of the cubes stands for one of the rehabilitation targets, stability, tightness and operation safety. The decision cubes are built according to several rehabilitation decisions of the network operator on potential rehab candidates from the particular network.
In this way the difference in the viewpoints of the particular network operators can be processed analytically – making STATUS decision making similar to that of the particular rehabilitation engineers.
Having assigned individual values for priority and wear reserve, the rehabilitation candidates are ranked according to specifications of the network operator. This ranking can be as individual as the ranking is in the daily routine of the network operator. At this point additional parameters are added to the initial ranking parameters priority and wear reserve. Ancillary conditions like ground water level, population density, traffic load, functional or even political issues may be considered important by the network operator. The preference of large diameter sewers over smaller ones or postponement of younger sewers (standard in case of equal priority and wear reserve) are examples of such individual settings.
Individual decision tree
The last step, before the next year in the forecast is carried out, is the processing of an extensive individual decision tree which considers all different ancillary conditions, restrictions and guidelines that are relevant from the viewpoint of the network operator. This decision tree reflects all questions, an engineer answers in order to justify or change a rehabilitation decision. Budget and amortization issues are most common, as well as special defect issues which may change the pre-selected rehabilitation method (no renovation if major deformation or displacement defects) or ancillary conditions like traffic loads above.
Decision trees are an appropriate method for analytically defining decision processes and decision rules within strategy forecasts as realistically as possible. They grant flexible and transparent definition and linking of hierarchic decision rules. Thus they suit the need for a tool that forms formal decision rules from empiric knowledge. Especially in the field of rehabilitation engineering in sewer networks, many of the rehabilitation decisions are based to a significant share on experience and specific, local knowledge that is of no use elsewhere. Standardized decision procedures often can not consider such individual knowledge and decision criteria.
With the use of decision trees for strategic forecasts all information which is linked to single network objects (e.g. DN for sewers) or network parts (e.g. flow for catchment areas) or object groups (e.g. corrosion protection for concrete manholes) or any way to the network itself (e.g. tariff constraints) can become decision criteria. Especially the possibility to include very individual information pieces coming from other information sources (e.g. flow-time from hydraulic analysis, condition and rehab probability for other infrastructures such as roads) into the decision tree is the primary strength of decision trees. This makes the strategy forecasts not only a tool to mirror and analyze the present rehabilitation preferences but also a tool to find an optimized rehabilitation path towards a sustainable network infrastructure. The decisions tree can not only fork on standard rehab decision criteria (e.g. defect types, defect severity, budget availability) but as well in time. This means that decision patterns can be designed as changing over time for example to reach a specific target in a certain predefined time.
After the finalization of all steps, the rehabilitation candidates selected within the particular year of the strategy are “virtually” rehabilitated and the forecast continues with the next year of the strategy. This way the development of various key figures such as asset net value, fees and tariffs and average rehabilitation priority show the sustainability of the strategies analyzed thus giving way to the selection of the most appropriate solution.
The approach has been used in numerous strategic rehabilitation planning projects. Due to the possibility of personalization of different strategies to the specific needs and requirements of the particular network operator, the strategy analysis delivered important additional information essential for the long-term strategic rehabilitation planning of the network operators and the various stakeholders.
With the information from comparative strategy analysis the pros and cons of the different rehabilitation approaches defined in the strategies have become clearly visible even though the real effect of a deficient strategy often only becomes apparent after decades.
The different parts of figure 5 and figure 6 show statements resulting from such strategic forecasts from recently carried out long-term rehabilitation planning projects, which would not have been possible – or far less precise – if the decision model could not have reflected the intentions of the network operator that closely.
The figures show some interesting aspects, as the maximum rehabilitation strategy (blue) has the same rehabilitation budget as the conventional rehabilitation strategy (yellow) only the applied rehab methods vary. The latter strategy focuses on replacement and rarely uses renovation. The sustainable strategy (green) although less well funded than the previous mentioned strategies can keep pace regarding the rehabilitation effects on the sewer network.
In this paper, an approach for rehabilitation strategy modelling is introduced. The combination of an ageing forecast for the deterioration of single sewers by using Markovchains completed with a three-step decision model significantly improves long-term rehabilitation planning by pre-emptive analysis of various rehabilitation strategies regarding their suitability for the utility. Network demands and network operator decisions can be modelled close to the real decision process of the utility, and thus the different rehabilitation paths into the future can be compared and validated leading towards an optimized rehabilitation strategy and giving long-term planning safety.
Dr.-Ing. Robert Stein
S & P Consult GmbH Bochum
Tel. +49 234 5167-110
Dipl.-Ing. Adrian Uhlenbroch
S & P Consult GmbH Bochum
Tel. +49 234 5167-164
More News and Articles
Nov 29, 2023
Researchers at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) have made a groundbreaking discovery that could change our understanding of evaporation, a ubiquitous process in our environment. They found that under certain conditions, light can directly cause evaporation without the need for …
Nov 27, 2023
NEW UNITRACC Construction Site Documentation: "Rehabilitation of a DN 400 Concrete Gravity Sewer with a SAERTEX-LINER® MULTI over a Length of 69 m" (CIPP)
New construction site documentation in the renovation section of the e-learning platform: Rehabilitation of a DN 400 concrete gravity sewer with CIPP lining using SAERTEX-LINER® MULTI, type S+ Standard. The objective of this rehabilitation measure was to enhance the structural …
Nov 27, 2023
Digitising water management
Nov 24, 2023
Budleigh Salterton is a popular and picturesque seaside town situated within the East Devon Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Located at the start of the stunning Jurassic Coast; a UNESCO World Heritage Site recognised for its outstanding rocks, fossils and …
Nov 22, 2023
Having been in business for 86 years, Interflow has proven it knows a thing or two about longevity. Right now, that requires an all-encompassing sustainability strategy, as Richard McCarthy, Interflow’s executive general manager southern region, explained.
Nov 20, 2023
An interview with Managing Director Robert Ristow
Nov 17, 2023
Tractebel and Aurecon forge strategic partnership to revolutionize dam projects in Queensland, Australia
Tractebel and Aurecon form a strategic alliance to revolutionize dam projects in Queensland, Australia, combining their global expertise and local knowledge to meet the rising demand for dam upgrades.
Nov 15, 2023
SA Water will use horizontal directional drilling (HDD) to assist in installing a section of pipe underneath the Melbourne to Adelaide rail corridor.
Nov 13, 2023
Saudi Arabia’s visionary city, Neom, is leading the way in sustainable water solutions with the construction of a desalination plant powered entirely by renewable energy.
Nov 10, 2023
Adept Civil Group has successfully delivered on a sewer reticulation extension project at the Charlemont Rise estate.
Nov 09, 2023
NEW LAUNCH: UNITRACC Module "Details on the Installation of Lining with UV Cured-in-Place Pipes" (Renovation: CIPP)
Introducing the new e-learning module for the course "Renovation: Lining with Cured-In-Place Pipes"! This module focuses on the installation of UV CIPP using the high-quality SAERTEX-LINER® specifically designed for gravity pipes and sewers - with contributions by renowned manufacturer SAERTEX …
Nov 08, 2023
Extreme rainfall, flooded streets, destroyed houses and infrastructure, people fighting for their lives amidst the floods. 2021 was also marked by such tragic events. It´s time to ask how flood disasters happen, and what can be done about them.